1. COURSE OBJECTIVES
This course provides students of finance and banking with fundamental and comprehensive theoretical and practical knowledge as well as practical skills in lending and other financial services of modern commercial banks. This module shall cover: process and techniques for traditional and modern credit granting, which is popularly used in the world; credit granting and management techniques; financial services available in commercial banks such as investment trust, financial consulting services, and insurance services.
2. COURSE CONTENTS
|
No |
Contents |
Time Allocation |
Contribution to CLO |
|||
|
Hour(s) on the class |
Essays, exercise, Assignments… (3) |
Self-study with teacher’s tutorials (4) |
||||
|
Lecture (1) |
Practice, Seminar… (2) |
|||||
|
1-2 |
Chapter 1: Introduction to bank credit |
6 |
0 |
3 |
12 |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7 |
|
3-5 |
Chapter 2: Credit analysis |
3 |
3 |
3 |
12.5 |
1,2,3,4 |
|
6 |
Chapter 3: Legal framework and bank credit security |
3 |
0 |
1.5 |
6 |
1,2,3,5 |
|
7-10 |
Chapter 4: Corporate and business lending and mid term test |
6 |
6 |
3 |
20 |
1,2,3,4,5 |
|
11-12 |
Chapter 5: Consumer lending |
3 |
3 |
3 |
12.5 |
1,2,3,4,5 |
|
13 |
Chapter 6: Other forms of finance |
3 |
3 |
3 |
7.5 |
1,2,3,4,5 |
|
14 |
Chapter 7: Credit risks for commercial banks |
3 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
1,2,3,4,5 |
|
15 |
Chapter 8: Case studies |
3 |
0 |
3 |
6 |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7 |
|
Total (hour) |
30 |
15 |
22.5 |
82.5 |
||
3. COURSE ASSESSMENT
– Score ladder: 10
– Type of assessment
|
Form |
Content |
Criteria |
CLO |
Proportion |
|
|
Formative |
Attendance |
Attendance randomly check Questions and exercises |
The number of attendances/participation in lesson/ability to answer questions |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 |
10% |
|
Midterm test: MCQ/Essay/Presentation |
Chapter 1-4 |
Written test (MCQ and/or writing…) |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 |
20% |
|
|
Report |
Group or individual assignment/Presentation Using Rubric to assess |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 |
10% |
||
|
Summative |
Final test |
The whole course |
Written test (MCQ and/or writing/open questions/exercises/cases…) |
1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 |
60% |
|
|
|
|
Total: |
100% |
|
- Grading rubrics for individual’s/group’s written assignment/report
|
Criteria |
CLO |
Weighted average |
Levels of Assessment |
Grade |
||||
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
||||
|
8,5-10 |
7-8,4 |
5,5-6,9 |
4,0-5,4 |
<4 |
||||
|
Format |
1 – 9 |
20% |
All assignment format’s requirements are met with a professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited. |
Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors |
Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited. |
Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar. |
Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements. |
|
|
Writing style |
1 – 9 |
20% |
Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. |
Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. |
Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas |
Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking |
Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas. |
|
|
Content |
1 – 9 |
50% |
Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism |
Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. |
Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate |
Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. |
Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20% |
|
|
Reference |
1 – 9 |
10% |
A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited. |
A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citations. |
Sources are reasonable but lack diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation. |
Sources lack diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citations. |
The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation. |
|
|
Member contribution |
1 – 9 |
Based on peer review |
Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group. |
Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. |
Not really proactive when participating. There is a delay in meeting group deadlines. |
Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating |
Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. |
|
|
Note: The lecturer instructs group members to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation. |
||||||||
- Grading rubrics for individual/group presentation
|
Criteria |
CLO |
Weighted Average |
Levels of Assessment |
Grade |
||||
|
A |
B |
C |
D |
F |
||||
|
8,5-10 |
7-8,4 |
5,5-6,9 |
4,0-5,4 |
<4 |
||||
|
Presentation Organization |
1 – 9 |
10% |
Clear and coherent organization which is easy and pleasant to follow |
Quite clear organization which is easy to follow |
Presentation organization is not clear and difficult to follow |
Presentation organization is unclear and incoherent |
Presentation organization is unclear, incoherent and difficult to follow. |
|
|
Presentation Content |
1 – 9 |
50% |
The content is very clear, coherent, and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the presentation |
Content is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical |
Content is unclear with some incoherent and vague main ideas |
Substandard content which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking |
Poor content with “copy and paste”, incoherent ideas |
|
|
Presentation skills |
1 – 9 |
10% |
Good and clear presentation, using body language to effectively attract and interact with audience |
Clear presentation with body language, but inadequate interaction with audience |
Mediocre presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience |
Substandard presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience |
Poor presentation without body language and inadequate interaction with audience |
|
|
Q & A |
1 – 9 |
10% |
Fluently answer all questions from audience |
Answer about 2/3 questions from audience |
Answer about 1/2 questions from audience |
Answer about 1/3 questions from audience |
Unable to answer any questions from audience |
|
|
Use of media |
1 – 9 |
10% |
PPT is clear, relevant, and well-designed. Handouts are provided to audience |
PPT is well-designed and easy to follow |
PPT is simple |
PPT is poorly designed and hard to follow |
None |
|
|
Presentation time |
1 – 9 |
5% |
Stay on time |
Over ¼ time limit |
Over 1/3 time limit |
Over ½ time limit |
Double time limit |
|
|
Dress code |
1 – 9 |
5% |
Formal and professional dress code |
Formal and neat dress code |
Casual and informal dress code |
Casual dress code |
Unsuitable and impolite dress code. |
|