TCHE446 – Entrepreneurship and Innovation

No.

Content

Time Allocation

Contribution to CLO 

Hour(s) on the class

Essays, exercise, 

Assignments

Self-study with teacher’s tutorials

Lecture

Practice, Seminar

1

Key Issues in Innovation  Management

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

1

2

Innovation as a Management  Process

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

1

3

Developing the Framework for an Innovation Strategy 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

1

4

National and Competitive Environment and Exploiting  Technological Trajectories

2

1 

1.5

5.5

2, 10 – 14

5

Integration for Strategic Learning 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

3, 10 – 14

6

Learning from Markets 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

3, 10 – 14

7

Learning through Alliances 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

3, 10 – 14

8

Learning through Corporate  Ventures 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

3, 10 – 14

9

Building the Innovative  Organization 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

3, 10 – 14

10

Generating and Testing Business  Ideas 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

4 – 6, 10 – 14

11

Entry Strategies 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

4 – 6, 10 – 14

12

Getting up and Running 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

4 – 6, 10 – 14

13

Raising Money 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

7 – 14

14

Building New Business Team 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

7 – 14

15

Growing Business 

2 

1 

1.5 

5.5

7 – 14

Total

30

15

22.5

82.5

Form 

Content

Criteria

CLO 

Proportion

Formative

Attendance

The number of attendances and participation in lesson

1-14

10%

Mid-term test

30-min test/Group report (15 pages)

1-14

30%

Summative

Final Exam

Written Exam 

MCQ and/or written exam

1-14

60%

Total:

100%

Criteria

CLO

Weighted Average

Levels of Assessment

Grade

A

B

C

D

F

8,5-10

7-8,4

5,5-6,9

4,0-5,4

<4

Format 

20%

All assignment format’s requirements are met with professional look. No spelling & grammar errors; well-presented tables & graphs; and sources are adequately cited. 

Assignment format has professional look but may have some format and spelling errors

Assignment has format, spelling and grammar errors. Sources are not adequately cited.

Assignment is sparsely written with many errors of format, spacing, spelling and grammar 

Assignment is carelessly written with many format errors; and fails to meet format’s requirements

Writing style  

20%

Writing is very clear, coherent, logically organized and interesting. Main ideas are well developed and supported throughout the paper. 

Writing is good with clear ideas, but some parts are not logical. 

Writing is unclear with some incoherent and vague ideas

Substandard writing which lacks logical organization. Ideas are vague with little evidence of critical thinking

Poor writing with mainly “copy and paste” ideas.

Content

50%

Content meets assignment requirements very well, and indicates the synthesis, expansion and in-depth analysis of ideas. No sign of plagiarism 

Content meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. However, content does not indicate the expansion of ideas. 

Content basically meets assignment requirements without sign of plagiarism. But some parts of content are inadequate

Content just meets the minimum requirement of assignment, without sign of plagiarism. But the analysis is underdeveloped and unoriginal. 

Content strays from the main topic; or plagiarism is over 20%

Reference

10%

A variety of sources are adequately and correctly cited.

A variety of sources are included, but there are some format errors and incorrect citation. 

Sources are reasonable but lack of diversity. There are quite a few format errors and incorrect citation.

Sources are lack of diversity. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

The writing does not use adequate research reference. There are many format errors and incorrect citation.

Member contribution

*Indicates the participation, responsibility and independence

Based on peer review

Active and adequate participation. Proactively working to meet deadline set by group.

Quite active and adequate participation. However, there is a delay in meeting group deadlines. 

Not really proactive when participating. there is a delay in meeting group deadlines.  

Just participate in a small part of group work. Not proactive when participating

Little or no participation. Shows no responsibility with work and often fails to meet deadlines. 

Note:  

Lecturer instructs group member to conduct peer review on a scale of 1 to 10, based upon the contribution of each member to group work. The grade of each member will be adjusted according to the peer review which reflects this member’s contribution and participation.